Page MenuHomeVyOS Platform

Support setting dstport for VXLAN interfaces
Closed, DuplicatePublicFEATURE REQUEST

Description

Currently it uses UDP port 8472 by default, which is not the IANA assigned port and there is no option to configure it.

Details

Difficulty level
Unknown (require assessment)
Version
-
Why the issue appeared?
Will be filled on close

Related Objects

StatusSubtypeAssignedTask
ResolvedFEATURE REQUESTc-po
DuplicateFEATURE REQUESTc-po

Event Timeline

syncer triaged this task as Low priority.
syncer added subscribers: UnicronNL, syncer.

can you add required nodes for this maybe
@UnicronNL please assist

cpo@CR1# set interfaces vxlan vxlan1 remote
Possible completions:
   <x.x.x.x>    Remote address of this VXLAN tunnel

This is the current supported CLI.

We could add set interfaces vxlan vxlan1 remote port but this looks ugly. Changing the ClI at all would break existing implementations.
Changing the port to the IANA default port could also break existing implementations. Any ideas @syncer?

Personally I'd prefer

set interfaces vxlan vxlan1 destination address x.x.x.x
set interfaces vxlan vxlan1 destination port x.x.x.x

And drop set interfaces vxlan vxlan1 remote

Same as we have in the firewall rules.

The VXLAN RFC states:

Destination Port: IANA has assigned the value 4789 for the
         VXLAN UDP port, and this value SHOULD be used by default as the
         destination UDP port.  Some early implementations of VXLAN have
         used other values for the destination port.  To enable
         interoperability with these implementations, the destination
         port SHOULD be configurable.

https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7348#section-5

IMO we should move to a RFC compliant implementation

i will propose to use dst-vtep instead of destination

@syncer: To recap, are you OK with the following changes:

  • Change default destination port to to the IANA assigned one (will break current setups)
  • Remove set interfaces vxlan vxlan1 remote
  • Add set interfaces vxlan vxlan1 dst-vtep address and set interfaces vxlan vxlan1 dst-vtep port

If that's ok I'll go for the changes ...

Found inside the Linux Kernels source code:

/* UDP port for VXLAN traffic.
 * The IANA assigned port is 4789, but the Linux default is 8472
 * for compatibility with early adopters.
 */
static unsigned short vxlan_port __read_mostly = 8472;
module_param_named(udp_port, vxlan_port, ushort, 0444);
MODULE_PARM_DESC(udp_port, "Destination UDP port");

Looks like that the initial idea is not possible as the VXLAN destination port can only be set system wide during load time of the Kernel module.

Looking through the sources I see that ./vyatta-conntrack/templates-cfg/system/conntrack/node.def holds a good example. Here a file /etc/modprobe.d/vyatta_nf_conntrack.conf is created that holds the module specific configuration.

We could use /etc/modprobe.d/vyos_vxlan.conf and populate it w/ options vxlan vxlan_port=1337

@syncer lets change proposal to:

  • Keep set interfaces vxlan vxlan1 remote
  • Add set interfaces vxlan port <num> as system wide configuration.

Note: Changing vxlan port requires reloading the Kernel Module (better reboot)

Okay, the proof of concept worked on the console

root@LR1:/home/cpo# cat /etc/modprobe.d/vyos_vxlan.conf
options vxlan udp_port=31337
root@LR1:/home/cpo# dmesg | tail -n 1
[  724.283680] VXLAN PORT: 31337

With a patched Kernel to print the VXLAN UDP port number used.

Unfortunately it looks like set interfaces vxlan port <num> can't be used (at least I was not able to PoC-it) b/c set interfaces vxlan <vxlanX> is a TAG node which prevents any other nodes parallel to it like port. @dmbaturin hopefully I'm wrong. Do you know of any other configuration tree where I can have a look?

Proposal for command:

set system module driver vxlan port <num>

This would enable us to add additional kernel module config params under set system module driver <x> param <y> and don't loose the future ability to maybe hardware dependent parameters on a mudular system via set system module <slot0> foo bar

Setting destination port per VXLAN interface sound much more reasonable