I think this should be re-opened. The solution that is documented does not follow the spirit of hairpin NAT, which is that traffic on port N not actually destined to the inside target should not be redirected.
- Queries
- All Stories
- Search
- Advanced Search
- Transactions
- Transaction Logs
Advanced Search
Oct 23 2022
Oct 19 2021
Of course, external services with the same port is not available
This is what you should expect from NAT rules (110)
Works exactly as configured
Oct 18 2021
Have you confirmed that you can access an external service(i.e. in the 192.168.0.20/24 network) hosted on port 22, and it is not being redirected to 172.24.33.33:22 after applying the rules above?
Oct 17 2021
Went with telegraf support instead
Dec 11 2020
There will be no ZeroTier in VyOS due to its license
see https://www.zerotier.com/2019/10/30/on-the-gpl-to-bsl-transition/
Any movement on this? ZeroTier integration would be fantastic.
Dec 1 2020
Oct 11 2020
Please post at forum.vyos.io for support
Sep 10 2020
Apr 17 2020
Apr 13 2020
decided to go with HAProxy
Mar 28 2020
Mar 8 2020
Mar 1 2020
it seems no additional work needed for LibreNMS so i close this one
Jan 1 2020
Oct 21 2019
Sep 27 2019
sorry, but their licensing model incompatible with what we do.
ZeroTier was added to the Ubiquiti EdgeRouter (which runs a vyatta fork) as a demo. Relevant to this thread:
https://blog.kruyt.org/zerotier-on-edgerouter-p2/
Sep 13 2019
This is a support request,
please use forum.vyos.io for such request
Sep 12 2019
Ok, closing as wontfix
Sep 3 2019
Please test with latest rolling and not a custom build.
Or may be you could tell me where I can include this commands? Also I need to setup correct owners for /config/user-data/zabbix/ dir, there is zabbix-proxy DB...
how could I show it to you? Which version have you try to update? I think simple chown in update script could fix it!
Also i think it could be compare with changing of list of users and thous IDs:
Old system list:
Aug 31 2019
can´t reproduce
Impossible to reproduce
Aug 8 2019
Please open this one as I want to get help from experts.
This is a support request,
closing in favor of forum post
https://forum.vyos.io/t/bgp-communities-filtering/3969/2
Jun 1 2019
Apr 14 2019
I see the same issue, does this need tests ?
Mar 18 2019
stop spamming
Mar 16 2019
See T1283
we now reworking this in favor of a cloud-init backed system with ovf environment as configuration source
this now passing VMWare certification and will be available shortly
Feb 8 2019
retest
Please retest with the latest rolling
if the problem still persists, reopen
can't reproduce
please try latest rolling and if the problem still persists
create new ticket with full config and env spec
no retest were done, rejecting
Feb 7 2019
archiving
Jan 5 2019
Jan 3 2019
Dec 28 2018
Hello
Please submit this on forum.vyos.io since it's a most likely configuration issue
provide complete config (you can strip public ips, but keep private)
Also can recommend using 1.2 as 1.1.x EOLed now
Dec 16 2018
Can´t reproduce, works fine for me
Dec 1 2018
you must use quotes
tshark -i eth1 -f 'host 10.217.10.254'
Nov 14 2018
Current implementation of clustering requires rework, see T985
No plan to add this to the base image
Nov 9 2018
this chain does not exist anymore in 1.2
Nov 1 2018
Oct 20 2018
no update
no plans for this in any near future
no manner to handle this efficiently at this time
Oct 19 2018
not relevant anymore
not relevant anymore
Not relevant since we moved to FRR
dnsmasq dropped in 1.2
forwarder implementation was rewritten in python
Please retest on 1.2 and resubmit if issue exists
Oct 15 2018
AFAICT frr has the correct computation.