Is there a way to isolate a NAT rule to operate within a VRF?
- Queries
- All Stories
- Search
- Advanced Search
- Transactions
- Transaction Logs
Feed Advanced Search
Advanced Search
Advanced Search
Oct 1 2022
Oct 1 2022
Feb 4 2022
Feb 4 2022
The problem in 1.3.0 is that if you delete the next-hop and then use a different next-hop, both next-hops are in the routing table. The next-hop that you deleted is still there:
Jan 28 2022
Jan 28 2022
It's good to know that it works as expected on 1.4-rolling. Is it possible to get a fix for 1.3?