- User Since
- Jul 23 2016, 10:07 AM (103 w, 6 d)
Jan 26 2018
What's the probability of seeing a 1.1.9 release sometime soon with this fix in it? I have a bunch of machines I'd like to upgrade to 1.1.8+, but it seems irritating to have to manually install an updated .deb on each of them.
Nov 13 2017
Oct 3 2017
Oct 2 2017
Do you want me to add it to T403 or make a new ticket?
Jul 24 2016
virtual_ipaddress_excluded is basically a list of lines that keepalived passes to ip addr add / ip addr del when the main VRRP state changes. Typically, it's used to manage more than 20 addresses with keepalived (only the first 20 go in virtual_ipaddress, which is in the actual VRRP packet; the rest are failed over through this out-of-band configuration). According to that thread (and past experience), it should work for this case.
If I make a patch to use virtual_ipaddress_excluded, do you prefer an arcanist diff or a github pull request?
Oh man, that's going to be a disaster for all the companies out there relying on mixed v4/v6 blocks (which is extremely common in v6 setups).
Also, here's the config that I'm running on my VyOS test VMs (with R33:5bccce5948cc44e76f8c9da93f1a1cf8f1212bca ):
Try it with vrrp_version 2; I believe that will work. It seems to default to standards-compliant behavior (that is to say, no mixed-virtual-addresses) in v3. Not sure if there's a way to turn that off or not. Here's what the config at my current employer looks like