oh sorry, just misunderstood the
- Queries
- All Stories
- Search
- Advanced Search
- Transactions
- Transaction Logs
Feed Advanced Search
Advanced Search
Advanced Search
Jan 11 2023
Jan 11 2023
jack9603301 awarded T3008: Migrate from ntpd to chronyd a Like token.
Oct 13 2021
Oct 13 2021
Georgiy-Tugai awarded T3008: Migrate from ntpd to chronyd a Like token.
Sep 21 2021
Sep 21 2021
Unknown Object (User) awarded T3008: Migrate from ntpd to chronyd a Like token.
Aug 29 2021
Aug 29 2021
Hey @erkin why hide this ticket? I'm still hoping for this change.
Oct 22 2020
Oct 22 2020
- If the user configures his cluster as a "pool" or a bunch of "server" they should work fine, he can also "allow" them to connect to him if he wishes. I would recommend connecting to a good pool myself, or a low stratum device hosted locally, instead of making some kind of cluster.
- https://listengine.tuxfamily.org/chrony.tuxfamily.org/chrony-users/2016/03/msg00001.html
Yes, absolutely, and if you visit the link in the post you'll see a comparison of them, and at the bottom is some explanation.
Oct 21 2020
Oct 21 2020
I have ntp listening in vrf mgmt, note that i have not set vrf bind-to-all.
Oct 20 2020
Oct 20 2020
Many thanks!
May 24 2019
May 24 2019
I commented out lines 389 and 390 in https://github.com/vyos/vyatta-cfg-system/blob/67b10e6ff5f33d73c128508f00198cc3c04c13fc/scripts/vyatta-interfaces.pl#L377.
May 19 2019
May 19 2019
Gunni updated the task description for T1385: Allow bonding interfaces to have pseudo-ethernet interfaces.