In T6162#180836, @Apachez wrote:In T6162#180827, @ErnyTech wrote:In T6162#180826, @Apachez wrote:Wouldnt it be better if the same commit goes to Intel to be included with the out-of-tree driver which generally have better featuresupport than the in-tree driver which seems to be somewhat crippled?
That is that this commit goes into upstream to both Linux kernel and Intel out-of-tree driver (in case the later is missing this support)?
This is up to Intel as far as I know
Well sure but did you file a case and send the commit to Intel aswell?
- Queries
- All Stories
- Search
- Advanced Search
- Transactions
- Transaction Logs
Feed Advanced Search
Advanced Search
Advanced Search
Mar 23 2024
Mar 23 2024
In T6162#180826, @Apachez wrote:Wouldnt it be better if the same commit goes to Intel to be included with the out-of-tree driver which generally have better featuresupport than the in-tree driver which seems to be somewhat crippled?
That is that this commit goes into upstream to both Linux kernel and Intel out-of-tree driver (in case the later is missing this support)?
Feb 23 2024
Feb 23 2024
Unfortunately I haven't seen this before, for me this choice of using the out-of-tree driver is extremely wrong!