That's a good point. I just might do that.
- Queries
- All Stories
- Search
- Advanced Search
- Transactions
- Transaction Logs
All Stories
Apr 16 2021
@jestabro Cool!!!
>>> from vyos.config import Config >>> import pprint >>> conf = Config() >>> # no mangling ... tmp = conf.get_config_dict(['simple'], get_first_key=True) >>> pprint.pprint(tmp) {'some-tag-node': {'some-foo': {'just-a-node': {'single-value': 'bar'}}, 'some-other-foo': {'just-a-node': {'multiple-value': ['first', 'second']}}}} >>> # standard mangling ... tmp = conf.get_config_dict(['simple'], get_first_key=True, key_mangling=('-', '_')) >>> pprint.pprint(tmp) {'some_tag_node': {'some_foo': {'just_a_node': {'single_value': 'bar'}}, 'some_other_foo': {'just_a_node': {'multiple_value': ['first', 'second']}}}} >>> # mangling with no_tag_node_value_mangle=True ... tmp = conf.get_config_dict(['simple'], get_first_key=True, key_mangling=('-', '_'), no_tag_node_value_mangle=True) >>> pprint.pprint(tmp) {'some_tag_node': {'some-foo': {'just_a_node': {'single_value': 'bar'}}, 'some-other-foo': {'just_a_node': {'multiple_value': ['first', 'second']}}}} >>>
Is there a specific reason not to put it in vyos-1x instead?
Apr 15 2021
Thank you. If you have any questions, please keep in touch.
@jack9603301 Unfortunately the only environment I have to test in is home, and my wife would probably kill me. ;) I also don't have a second "router PC" available right now which I would need before I can spin up VyOS and give it a try. I need to keep the other system untouched so I have something I can fall back on if I can't make VyOS work the way I want, and the hardware is old enough that if I virtualize my router OS, network performance suffers. I tried using ESXi with OPNsense and WAN throughput was down 200-300Mbps vs. what I can do on the bare metal.
@ZPrime Although UPNP is not merged, you are welcome to test it if you wish, and if you have any questions, please let me know (you can also get in touch with me on Stack) so I can fix it before merging
ipv6 address autoconf works here. It does pick up a v6 address from the RA - I had an error in the config on the router issuing the RA announcements, and thought that autoconf was not working, but it does. Perhaps this issue should be closed?
Some notes from past meetings.
That would also good to get this working:
@c-po There is some recent news on FRR's NHRPD and multicast support it seems, please see here:
Apr 14 2021
The suggested resolution is to define an include file with the syntaxVersion element. The syntaxVersion element contains the component name and version number; the including interface definition file corresponds to the conf_mode script. Hence, this defines a mapping
Apr 13 2021
- A̶d̶d̶ ̶c̶h̶e̶c̶k̶s̶ ̶t̶o̶ ̶p̶r̶e̶v̶e̶n̶t̶ ̶s̶e̶t̶ ̶i̶p̶ ̶a̶d̶d̶r̶e̶s̶s̶ ̶f̶o̶r̶ ̶c̶o̶n̶t̶a̶i̶n̶e̶r̶ ̶o̶u̶t̶ ̶o̶f̶ ̶r̶a̶n̶g̶e̶ ̶"̶p̶r̶e̶f̶i̶x̶" done
set container name alp02 image 'alpine' set container name alp02 network NET01 address '192.0.2.1' set container network NET01 ipv4-prefix '10.0.0.0/24
error
time="2021-04-14T00:52:03+03:00" level=error msg="Error adding network: failed to allocate all requested IPs: 192.0.2.1" time="2021-04-14T00:52:03+03:00" level=error msg="Error while adding pod to CNI network \"NET01\": failed to allocate all requested IPs: 192.0.2.1" Error: unable to start container "60f20a2b517b4f828bef5683cd8a20504aa984648a0911f7f8df5c1a064d2625": error configuring network namespace for container 60f20a2b517b4f828bef5683cd8a20504aa984648a0911f7f8df5c1a064d2625: failed to allocate all requested IPs: 192.0.2.1
The issue exists because the ifupdown package that is required for the eni renderer was removed by the https://github.com/vyos/vyatta-cfg-system/commit/3dd837f2d3518b7ddcf8e1ab68d8ab9f3eff0968
To not take back it again for all the platforms, the problem was resolved by the https://github.com/vyos/vyos-vm-images/commit/090e5367dc6df9b49c037e0b60f7adfafdf54a53 , so all the images created with the vyos-vm-images should not contain the problem with the renderer.
This task must be obsoleted by the https://phabricator.vyos.net/T2116
Just a small update on this.
PXE boot service for all 1.2 / 1.3 / 1.4 versions is up and running in private testing.
looks like this was missing in the bgp template
manually adding to /usr/share/vyos/templates/frr/bgp.frr.tmpl:
{% if afi_config.as_override is defined %} neighbor {{ neighbor }} as-override {% endif %}
Apr 12 2021
UPnP is something I require (as a home user with multiple gaming systems), so I'm very happy to see this making progress in VyOS. I've been getting tired of the mess over in pfSense/OPNsense-land, wanting to try a Linux-based router, and I'm familiar with VyOS from past experience with "EdgeOS" on Ubiquiti hardware so it was on the top of my list, but held back by lack of UPnP in the past.
Thanks!
@danhusan that PR was only done to current and not backported. I just packported it to the crux branch.
Sorry for the late reply, I've dismantled the setup as I needed to put the PPP link back in use, I will look into it again tonight. In essence, it would be good to see something like this on terse view:
sudo journalctl -b
lspci -knn
The reason these validations https://github.com/vyos/vyos-1x/blob/aca3254d96d01cc37c9e15e02e500a36f3708959/interface-definitions/vrrp.xml#L220-L224
There is no such problem in version 1.4.
@Viacheslav 1.2.7.
@c-po I expected this to go into 1.2.7 but it did not. How would I tag this properly so it hopefully makes it into 1.2.8?
Apr 11 2021
This can be close. The commit is working again after upgrading to the latest rolling
Submitted following PR: