Should we just add letsencrypt ?

@EinHander can you confirm same behaviour on 1.2 ?

Please use transition scripts as suggested by @aopdal
Moving this to 1.2 roadmap

@c-po wondering if this something that was fixed by you previously?

Got no follow up,
closing this

Here is patch:
diff --git a/bgpd/bgp_aspath.c b/bgpd/bgp_aspath.c

I'd like to get some clarity on this, if possible. Will VyOS's firewall features just not work at all with IPv6? Or will it work, but you have to use something other than groups? Importantly: Is it still possible for me to secure my network if I enable IPv6?

Comment by @beamerblvd on 2016-01-24:

The above completes the migration of content and all comments for Bugzilla issue 112.

Comment by Daniel Corbe on 2016-01-12:

Comment by Brett Lykins on 2015-09-28:

Comment by Jason Nadeau on 2015-09-27:

Comment by Patrick van Staveren on 2015-09-25:

Comment by Jeremy Church on 2015-08-24:

Comment by Steve Froelich on 2015-08-21:

Comment by Aaron Von Gauss on 2015-05-03:

Comment by @dmbaturin on 2015-05-03:

Comment by @darkdragon-001 on 2015-04-19:

Comment by Aaron Von Gauss on 2015-03-27:

Comment by Kouak on 2015-03-18:

Comment by @beamerblvd on 2015-03-06:

Comment by Kouak on 2015-03-05:

Comment by @beamerblvd on 2015-03-05:

Comment by @beamerblvd on 2015-03-03:

Comment by @dmbaturin on 2014-10-07:

Comment by Ryan Holt posted on 2014-09-02:

So is the correct course of action for me to create a new issue and manually copy over the contents of the issue and all of the comments?

@beamerblvd no migration was done.

Okay, so I want to make sure I'm clear on something. We have not migrated any issues over? Or we have migrated some, but not others?

waagent log

my azure image works on azure too. the image is here: https://dev.vyos.jp/vyos/dev-images/vyos_azure_image.img
and walinuxagent is running on it. I'm checking walinuxagent status.

https://www.reddit.com/r/networking/comments/75c30y/create_a_static_public_ip_address_for_home_use/

We will not address this in 1.1.x
please retest on 1.2. and reopen ticket or create new one

BusyBox is a multi-call binary. A multi-call binary is an executable program that performs the same job as more than one utility program. That means there is just a single BusyBox binary, but that single binary acts like a large number of utilities. This allows BusyBox to be smaller since all the built-in utility programs (we call them applets) can share code for many common operations.

+1 for removal of telnet

Well, I think that if someone has a system with only telnet as a remote access method, it could be anoying to update and realize that you have lost any chance to remote access.
I vote to maintain or add a script that convert telnet to ssh configuration.

+1 for removal

Well, may be we just have to either:

If you have a lab to try - may be you can just copy

As VyOS fully re-uses Debian packages it is not possible to enable any given applet inside Busybox. To get this enabled, VyOS has to maintain a forked version of the Debian busybox packages which makes life only harder.

I will advise to try latest rolling release from here
dev.packages.vyos.net/iso/current/amd64/

@UnicronNL please add package
https://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=wakeonlan
This is client tool (to wake up servers/hosts) we will be adding op mode command for it

added jessie one. https://github.com/vyos/dnsmasq
need to test in 1.1.8 rc1

I see your point, but generally, you want to use uRPF by receiving a BGP feed with prefixes to block, with a specific next hop, so you need to statically route this nexthop to blackhole, so all the prefixes are blackholed and uRPF can kick in.

As most of network internals inferred from Linux kernel, there is no direct way to achieve what you want.
You messing two different things as uRPF and recursive lookup. First works fine, second impossible.

Does that mean uRPF is useless in VyOS, or is there a workaround I failed to find ?

@dponzone check this thread, https://superuser.com/questions/1229275/linux-static-recursive-routes-not-supported
it will not work in a way you willing to have

The version and the relevant lines of configuration are at the beginning.
Am I missing something ?

No version
No config
You have some task to accomplish and it not works as you need.

I am sorry, this is bug, I hardly see why it should be a support question.

@UnicronNL @dmbaturin
can we just rebuild fresh from wheeze?

@UnicronNL The debian repo for helium is here: http://dev.packages.vyos.net/legacy/repos/debian/helium/

@higebu @syncer squeeze is added to ci, only there is no repo to upload.

@dmbaturin @syncer Where can i find the lithium repo?

@dmbaturin @syncer Where can i find the lithium repo?