This is actually disabllowed by latest Debian/systemd hostnamectl. A migration script is required though.
- Queries
- All Stories
- Search
- Advanced Search
- Transactions
- Transaction Logs
All Stories
Apr 17 2019
Apr 16 2019
I haven't planned to extend anything for it.
@dmbaturin I don't have access to push it, please review and apply/reject PR.
@yun thanks
@dmbaturin Any idea how we can address this?
@hagbard closed request
In T1250#35137, @UnicronNL wrote:@yun What is the exact frr command you tried?
the command you tried manually.
ok. @UnicronNL please reject my PR then. thx.
@yun What is the exact frr command you tried?
the command you tried manually.
@hagbard This commit adds a route to the kernel routingtable and bypassing FRR, this is no good and this would break. Please make the script add the appropiate commands to frr instead. This way frr will be in charge of populating the kernel table. Also note that this route needs to be removed on dhcp release
@hagbard that commit sets a kernel route. that is not good.
@yun it's only that single line.
Any news about this ?
I would to see this committed. But do we also know what causes the issue? Is it with FRR or was this script just missing the ip command to set the default gw?
Thanks @rherold! Good to know that radvd already supports link-local IPv6 selection!
No firmwares in 1.2.1 crux
so this not works as expected
Apr 15 2019
In addition I never received any feedback from the board vendor.
Apr 14 2019
I see the same issue, does this need tests ?
Apr 13 2019
Apr 11 2019
@syncer The only thing I can do it monitoring upstream, which hasn't released a patch for over a year to address that issue.
Title should be something like "Add an option to exclude source IP addresses from transparent web proxying" because destination IP is a different option.
so, how can i do NAT from 10.0.0.0/8 to /24 with public ip's ?
Apr 10 2019
With apologies (not having used Phabricator before), I think I may not have filed this bug report correctly. I also did not intend to "triage" it when filing it, as this should be done by a responsible adult! :-)
Apr 9 2019
This requires fix, since workaround not fully acceptable
Apr 8 2019
Hello runar,
I know that it's possible to do it manually.
But I really would like to see a more integrated solution where you can add a check for the next hop inside the configuration.
Hi zsdc,
Hi all,
Apr 7 2019
Assuming this works - please reopen if not
Apr 6 2019
Apr 5 2019
Thanks for reopening and reporting.